Microsoft Project Server vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and SAP Portfolio and Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Project Server vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's fine to navigate for a layperson.""SharePoint site integration""We use the tool in our IT-related projects. All IT efforts are managed using the Microsoft Project Server. Every week, we have a project status meeting where we demonstrate the project's status using the tool. We track tasks and progress, assign owners, and monitor milestones and all project-related work using it.""The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the tool's reporting is very good.""Microsoft Project Server helps organizations in collaboration.""Project schedule management is very good. Basically, it sits on SharePoint. So, every time we create a project, a new project site is created within that SharePoint environment, which is a very good document repository. It allows us to create issues and risks lists and additional functionality to keep track of what's going on with projects.""The ability to look at the resource loading is most valuable.""The technical support for Microsoft Project Server and the support is very good. Microsoft support is working very well."

More Microsoft Project Server Pros →

"SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs.""The integration portion with SAP models is valuable."

More SAP Portfolio and Project Management Pros →

Cons
"This solution could improve by adding integration with Primavera schedules to allow the reading and management of them.""When we started using this solution from scratch, we got lost. Microsoft should provide some templates for configurations for certain use cases.""Project Server could be improved by simplifying how tasks are assigned and reviewed on a daily basis.""It would be better if the solution had some more training or resources available for a person who is new to Microsoft Project Server.""The solution could improve the ease of access could improve. It can be time-consuming.""When a lot of users logged onto the site, it took a big toll on the service. Therefore, there is a scalability issue.""I'd like it if we could divide out the project calendars. On one project server, we might follow five projects or more at one time, and we'd like to see all of the items at once so that it becomes a long loop, but one where we can identify different projects in tandem and then focus on which we need to at the time. While I only have visibility into one, I'd like to see several at a time.""Microsoft Project Server's user interface is pretty average, and sometimes it can have bugs."

More Microsoft Project Server Cons →

"It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket.""The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of information simultaneously."

More SAP Portfolio and Project Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."
  • "The licensing was procured before my involvement."
  • "It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."
  • "It is on the expensive side."
  • "There is a licensing cost."
  • "There is an annual license required for this solution."
  • "I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
  • "I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
  • More Microsoft Project Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.
    Top Answer:The solution is very expensive. It is a part of my enterprise database. I am paying a subscription for it. It doesn't cost for hardware but for other tools to use.
    Top Answer:Microsoft is going to integrate the Co-Pilot features into Microsoft Project. The AI feature is an additional feature. It can look at the plan and identify risks early on from any part of your… more »
    Top Answer:The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of… more »
    Top Answer:We use it for end-to-end project management as per the received requirements. There is a customized module called the Project Management System (PMS) where we receive the requirements. Once a… more »
    Top Answer:SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,175
    Comparisons
    1,038
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    356
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    1,033
    Comparisons
    868
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    945
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Project Server
    Portfolio and Project Management
    Learn More
    Overview
    Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.
    Portfolio Management integrates information from existing project management, human resources, and financial systems to provide an overview of the project portfolio with easy drilldown to details for portfolio managers, project managers, and resource managers. This enables innovative and collaborative, cross-functional business processes. Project Management covers the entire range of project management activities in development and consultancy projects, from planning to implementation to project completion.
    Sample Customers
    Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
    Joy Global Inc., Citrix, EMC Corporation, Concho Resources, Concho Resources, RZD Russian Railways, Family Dollar Stores Inc., Lenovo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Project Server vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Project Server vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Project Server is ranked 5th in Project Portfolio Management with 56 reviews while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ranked 9th in Project Portfolio Management with 4 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 8.0, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Portfolio and Project Management writes "End-to-end project management capabilities and offers seamless vendor and client contract alignment". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and Planview Portfolios, whereas SAP Portfolio and Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, Jira, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware and Planview PPM Pro. See our Microsoft Project Server vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management report.

    See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

    We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.