We performed a comparison between Microsoft Secure Score and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."Microsoft Secure Score's most valuable feature is identity."
"It is enterprise-wide accessible. So, it is very helpful for all the employees in our bank. They can log in and do their risk management activities. It has a few inbuilt modules that are helpful for doing risk management activities, such as issue management, risk identification, risk assessment, and policy exception management. It also has some inbuilt workflows inside these modules. They are also helpful."
"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."
"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
"With RSA Archer, an admin can set permissions for a normal user to go directly to the tool they need to input some data. Admins can then go through that and approve some requests. Also, they can log in based on these kinds of permissions, including ticketing, service patches, or upgrades."
"Archer has simplified our security audits. It's made it easier to raise and trigger questionnaires to customers."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"Solution is scalable."
"It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements."
"They could indicate whether a recommendation aligns with different compliance standards."
"The solution as a whole could be simplified."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"I find the tech support to be inadequately knowledgeable."
"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"Solution could use more inbuilt applications."
"Its customization features could be better."
"I would like to see real-time data, from vulnerabilities, and threats."
Microsoft Secure Score is ranked 7th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 1 review while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in IT Vendor Risk Management with 38 reviews. Microsoft Secure Score is rated 9.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Secure Score writes "Stable product with a valuable identity feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Microsoft Secure Score is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Amazon Inspector, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk.
See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.