We performed a comparison between Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and its robustness."
"Security is the best feature of Microsoft Azure Sentinel. It has its own base security. Our customers like that the security is available in Azure."
"Valuable features include UD, SSO functionality, MFA and Adaptive MFA functionality, ability to link multiple Directory databases with UD."
"The product’s most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."
"The provisioning functionality has been the most valuable. This solution has good performance, fast integration and is very responsive."
"It offers very helpful support. The technical team is very helpful."
"We find the solution to be reliable for our customers and it is nice that it is cloud-based and can be accessed from anywhere."
"First of all, the solution is very simple."
"Okta integrates well with other solutions. Once you have integrated an application into Okta and onboarded a user, they will be onboarded for just-in-time provisioning."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"The shortcomings in the stability need improvement."
"We had some feedback from customers who have said it was a confusing product. The product is confusing to use for the end-user. For example, they do not know how to migrate the Azure Sentinel, but others have liked the product that has started working on it."
"Support could be a bit faster."
"The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved."
"It's not compatible with on-premises installations, unless you host it as a SaaS. We were not able to do that. For example, imagine a scenario where the cloud is not available. Then, Okta will not work for you. That use case will readily fail because it doesn't have an on-premises installation that you can use to authenticate or provide identity and access management. If you have a purely on-premises solution that is not connected to the internet, then this will not work. This is one area that can be improved."
"UD attribute mapping, Okta group rules, and dynamic usage could use improvement. It also needs more in-depth functionality and features to integrate with RADIUS solutions."
"The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible."
"Therefore, if you have 10 million users, that's almost 100 million, so it is costly."
"Its pricing needs improvement."
"The product does not offer enough integration capabilities."
More Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso is ranked 18th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 3 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 59 reviews. Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso is rated 9.0, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso writes "Offers robustness and ease of use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso is most compared with , whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0. See our Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.