We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Yammer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Setting up Teams was not difficult."
"It's great for meeting conferences."
"The collaborating feature."
"You can add teams to a conversation. You can create reports, project plans, or many other things based on Microsoft solutions. It has improved communication between teams and within each team."
"The initial setup process is straightforward for technical executives."
"The solution helps with collaborative communication. You can use it to chat and book calls. You can even set the status as away. It also has a transcript feature integrated."
"SharePoint is the most important thing of the solution where you can share your data. I am also impressed with the real-time transcript feature."
"The solution's stability is quite good, and it doesn't crash and freeze up when you have a large number of users."
"Yammer shows the post’s actions, comments, and how people react. We can quickly see what's going on."
"It was a stable solution...It was a highly scalable solution considering it was used in a very big company."
"Yammer brings in the most relevant posts to the users."
"The posting features are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Yammer is its interface."
"The initial setup was simple and straightforward."
"The design of the solution is its most valuable feature."
"Its most valuable features are the storyline and communities."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The solution needs to be integrated with Microsoft Planner. I have also faced issues with stability in the first month."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Its screen-sharing feature could be better compared to a few competitors."
"The software could be optimized for Mac systems because sometimes it is slow and consumes a lot of memory."
"The product needs to improve its stability."
"The solution needs to improve the APIs."
"The product should improve its pricing."
"Users need to be in the Acting Directory to exploit the features."
"The way you want to control the communication could be an issue. It depends on what kind of company you are. We are a public company, and there are some regulations that we need to comply with. Its ease of use can be an issue for a company because anybody can subscribe and use it. There are many competitors that are overlapping. Since Microsoft bought Yammer, it tends to be in the shadow. It is not put in the front from the service perspective."
"Yammer's UX and UI are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required"
"The solution must be able to stream by itself, without integration, the same way that you are able to do it on Facebook Live, Instagram, etc. Streaming must be embedded into it."
"I would like to see a fancier user interface. That is one of the weak points of Yammer."
"Sometimes, we lose access to the solution for unknown reasons."
"Yammer has very limited features."
"The product seems to just add to the complexity of using existing tools."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 145 reviews while Yammer is ranked 4th in Enterprise Social Software with 60 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Yammer is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Yammer writes "Ease of use and a familiar user interface". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas Yammer is most compared with Workplace by Facebook, SAP Jam, Chatter, Jive and Interact Intranet. See our Microsoft Teams vs. Yammer report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
