We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"The solution is scalable."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It is difficult to maintain."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 41 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 12th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Kong Gateway Enterprise. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
