We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I am able to authenticate my users on cloud and SaaS applications such as Workday through Okta workflows."
"The most valuable features are ease of operation and visibility."
"Its integration components are most valuable. It integrates with everything in some way. There are some products, such as O365 or AD, with which it completely and 100% integrates. So, you can seamlessly create accounts across the board with some of these products. For some of the products with which it doesn't completely integrate, you can do some kind of interfacing."
"We find the solution to be reliable for our customers and it is nice that it is cloud-based and can be accessed from anywhere."
"The solution can scale very well."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are MFA, and SSO, which have high security."
"The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."
"Okta controls all the users. It has context-based access from the user and type of device. It identifies the risk and can do a step of authentication when that user is trying to access some sensitive application from an unknown device."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The solution is simple to use."
"Its pricing needs improvement."
"We still had to write several internal programs/scripts to complete the user-provisioning process. Okta does not have the ability to provision mailbox accounts for on-premise Exchange or in a hybrid O365 environment. The Group Push function from Okta to AD did not work reliably in our environment."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."
"We had some implementation issues."
"The solution should have greater on-premises availability, not just cloud and more package customization in its processing."
"It would be pricing, which is a tough one because it goes against Microsoft. A lot of companies say they're a Microsoft partner, and they get all their software for free. Okta is like a luxury product, and it's not the most affordable one. I would say if they could work on pricing, it would help. Other than that, they've done great strides in developing a product that is really good. The companies that do see the value tend to invest in it."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The lifecycle management part can be improved. It should also have identity governance and the ability to choose a specific factor authentication at the application level. Its licensing and pricing can also be improved."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 59 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 21st in Single Sign-On (SSO). Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, SailPoint IdentityIQ, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Auth0. See our Okta Workforce Identity vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.