We performed a comparison between OpenESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."OpenESB pushes the organization to clearly define service boundaries and interfaces. So it motives the business and the development teams to clearly define their business services and processes they want to implement. OpenESB supports fine and coarse-grain granularity for the services and supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition."
"The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration."
"One of the most valuable features is being able to implement business processes while keeping track of the design from BPMN to a BPEL Implementation."
"The core is very stable."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
"The ability to master the process in one location."
"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"The routing and aggregation are the most valuable features. It's split and join."
"Cloud deployment is weak and needs to be improved."
"The documentation of the product must be improved. It could be tricky to find the right documentation on a topic since the documentation is spread in many places. I advise the new joiner to contact the community to get entry points and additional documentation. Tutorial and Video must be present to take up the product."
"Regarding its management, a web console being able to synchronize distributed instances would be great."
"The documentation needs to be better."
"Security features can be improved to better protect the server."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"If they can containerize this, that would be nice. If they can provide docker images and offer support for those containers, that would be great."
"The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations."
OpenESB is ranked 13th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 4 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 6th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. OpenESB is rated 8.6, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenESB writes "Enables us to define the business process and integrate it with other software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". OpenESB is most compared with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and Mule ESB, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and Fiorano ESB. See our OpenESB vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.