We performed a comparison between OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB and ServiceNow CMDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Configuration Management Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of this solution is the discovery."
"It can discover almost everything and creates relationship among discovered CIs, along with creating topology modeling."
"It scales easily with future expansion."
"The auto-discovery feature is great."
"It can discover various pieces from hardware, software, custom applications, and tie them together to create a map using ASM."
"Precision, trustworthiness, reconciliation, and user-friendly presentation are the key features I value most."
"The product is easy to set up."
"It is a dependable source of data. If I want to understand what technologies are used to deliver certain business outcomes, this is what I would use. I can know that this particular server is being used to deliver this business application or business service."
"I like ServiceNow CMDB's discovery tools. If you have discovery tools and the discovery tools are built around a philosophy of mapping, then we can implement a top-down architectural mapping of the elements in the upper structure and create your CI."
"ServiceNow excels in integration and is considered the best tool in the market for this purpose."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to extract the details of organizational hardware and provide the latest setup updates."
"ServiceNow is basically a go-to when it comes to Remedy and ticket management."
"We chose ServiceNow because it has more functionalities. It takes at least one week to be trained on ServiceNow, and it is easy to learn."
"The most valuable feature of ServiceNow CMDB is that it provides transparency and tracking of CI usage across multiple process owners or service owners."
"The initial setup isn't too complicated."
"Improve the GUI and documentation."
"The implementation could be simplified."
"The page loading is very slow."
"Making it simpler to set up and understand would be a big improvement."
"When we work in an environment, the production environment continuously changes and at that time we should have knowledge about the new server (node). However, the auto-discovery part should automatically discover the new CI (node/servers) in an environment and inform the IT person."
"ServiceNow CMDB could be easier to use. Beginners don't always understand the features. It would be helpful if ServiceNow offered more training or self-guided courses where people could learn to leverage the platform better. I've used ServiceNow for a long time, but I see new users struggling with these processes. There's a steep learning curve."
"An area for improvement in ServiceNow is the reporting because there are reporting features that would be better when done within the platform, rather than having to buy the performance analytics model. There is so much difference between the dashboarding that you can do from the platform versus what's on the performance analytics model. Some of the features currently available within performance analytics would be good to have within the platform because sometimes, customers will say that the tool is okay, but it's not enough, so you'll need to go with the performance analytics model, and that's costly."
"In general, the pain points are related to ServiceNow. There is a lack of development. ServiceNow is not a true configuration management tool. So, a lot of development is needed to get it to be the kind of tool that you would like it to be. It serves as a platform, and you only get out of it what you invest in terms of development. So, CMDB on its own isn't quite robust until you actually have a CMD project to make it robust. The same thing is there with asset management and all other parts of it. Out of the box, it's not competitive with a like-for-like application."
"There is some customization we need from the customer side."
"There are areas that could be improved, but that's a longer discussion. It all depends on what you are looking to do with it and then it becomes an issue of how do you configure the CMDB accordingly."
"It depends on the implementation, but the out-of-the-box product tends to be fixed on the support people. From a linear standpoint, I would like to see a certain number of fields on a table and a related list to describe the support personnel."
"There's room for improvement in terms of integration."
"There could be room for enhancing customization capabilities."
More OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB is ranked 5th in Configuration Management Databases with 11 reviews while ServiceNow CMDB is ranked 1st in Configuration Management Databases with 31 reviews. OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow CMDB is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB writes "Secure with a quick setup and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow CMDB writes "It has helped us consolidate information, improving reporting and visibility". OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB is most compared with , whereas ServiceNow CMDB is most compared with BMC Atrium CMDB, Device42 and IBM Tivoli CMDB. See our OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB vs. ServiceNow CMDB report.
See our list of best Configuration Management Databases vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.