We performed a comparison between Oracle Content Management and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."
"SharePoint enabled the staff to share documents and work on a document simultaneously."
"It is very stable."
"The product makes it easy to manage lists, forms, searching, and security. One of the most valuable features is its integration with Active Directory."
"It is well supported by Microsoft."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news."
"The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
"I would like it to be more compliant with global regulations. There are certain features which could be included that currently are not there, such as compliance and record management capabilities."
"The product does not perform 100% when used outside of a Microsoft based browser, Chrome, Firefox, etc."
"We would like more security features, like automating."
"Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format."
"You still need a bit of expertise to add branding."
"Needs improvement on the user interface."
"We do sell Hyland OnBase, which is probably a competitor to SharePoint and does a lot more. In our own organization, we haven't had a need for it, but certainly, for our customers, we are finding that to be a better fit. In terms of the technical reasons for that, I'm not involved much on that side, so I can't give specifics, but there is certainly room for them to improve or add on certain features that clearly are not available in SharePoint, but they are available in Hyland OnBase."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive, Alfresco and OpenText Extended ECM, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box. See our Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.