We performed a comparison between OpenText Extended ECM and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ability to add metadata and use that to categorize information is a valuable feature of OpenText Extended ECM."
"An SAP user can store documents directly into OpenText without a connector."
"Being able to tag metadata on documents and being able to have different workspaces in there for our documents is valuable. We do loan documents, and different types of documents have different types of retentions. We are able to categorize based on that, and we are able to do tag searching to find what we are looking for."
"The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document."
"The integration of a document management platform with many other applications, e.g. SAP, SuccessFactors, Salesforce, SharePoint, etc."
"OpenText Extended ECM's most valuable features include permissions and security models. I also like the tool's ability to add metadata and use it to categorize information."
"It's a very good solution."
"We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important."
"A dashboard with information would be nice to see."
"The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."
"We are looking for new, advanced UI features. Currently, the UI does not look great."
"OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."
"There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better."
"The solution should work better with partners and be more developer-friendly."
"The solution needs to improve the user interface."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Box, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and IBM FileNet. See our OpenText Extended ECM vs. Oracle Content Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.