We performed a comparison between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The OIC is very good."
"The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The solution is scalable."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"Exception handling needs to be improved."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
"The technical support must be improved."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and Azure Data Factory, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Tungsten TotalAgility. See our Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs. Tungsten RPA report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
