We performed a comparison between Oracle WebCenter and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."
"Integration within the solution is very good."
"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."
"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."
"The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."
"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."
"It offers an easy way to store unstructured content (.pdf, .doc, .xls, images) and to tag them with metadata."
"It's stable. It's very widely used by companies. Also, the knowledge of the product has improved over the years, and by other companies that support it or are Microsoft SharePoint partners. So if there are problems, there's always a user or company that knows the information or can help you; even with very uncommon problems."
"SharePoint has an option where you can open files on the browser, whereby more than five people can make amendments to one Excel online file."
"Tech support tops off as excellent."
"Quantity and variety of partners with solution development ability on the platform."
"Its configuration management ability is critical for document-based systems."
"The access control is definitely a good feature. We also appreciate the improvements they've made to the online applications, where multiple users can work on the same documents simultaneously. Everything syncs automatically."
"SharePoint has made things easier with the increased functionality for building the portals, microsites, and total integration with Microsoft categories."
"Its functions need more stability."
"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."
"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."
"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."
"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."
"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."
"The limitations and boundaries must be extended."
"It does not integrate despite being part of the Microsoft family."
"I would like it to be more compliant with global regulations. There are certain features which could be included that currently are not there, such as compliance and record management capabilities."
"It will fully use your system resources."
"The integration with Outlook could be improved."
"SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do."
"Needs improvement on the user interface."
"The management of the product/back-end is complex."
Oracle WebCenter is ranked 15th in Enterprise Content Management with 12 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Gives me easy access, connection and compatibility with all of the Oracle products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and IBM FileNet, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box. See our Oracle WebCenter vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors, best Web Content Management vendors, and best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.