PingAccess vs Symantec Siteminder comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ping Identity Logo
281 views|204 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
1,772 views|1,349 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PingAccess and Symantec Siteminder based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Access Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is highly stable and scalable"

More PingAccess Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the integration with the Active Directory.""All of our applications get a point, click, and you are in, while we increase security at the same time.""The solution is easy to use for our managers.""It has the ability to authenticate and authorize users. It is the main feature for our security.""Federation is valuable, for sure, because we have a lot of third-party vendors that we need to integrate with, and this is a turnkey solution in some ways.""We almost never have outages nor see slowdowns.""Symantec Siteminder Is both scalable and stable.""A valuable feature of Siteminder is the way it handles bulk traffic. The features it has, in terms of routing the traffic and load balancing, are good."

More Symantec Siteminder Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup appears to be difficult in the beginning."

More PingAccess Cons →

"To add more value to this solution it needs to be more user-friendly.""The GUIs are not very clear, especially when integrating with other products from CA.""The technical support could be better.""The support could be faster.""We are finding some compatibility issues. We're still working with CA on them.""Better documentation. I went through some sessions on single sign-on for version 12.7.""We're currently unable to find information about if the solution can do a full implementation with SQL. Some better and more accessible documentation for new users or those curious about the product would be helpful.""All the problems that we reported actually have never been resolved. We could not capture enough information for CA to be able to debug the problem."

More Symantec Siteminder Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market."
  • "I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one."
  • "CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big."
  • "Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price."
  • "The licensing is fair for this solution."
  • "Siteminder is a little costly. You pay for licensing, and they offer packages, so if you have less users, then you have to buy different products at different prices. If you have more of a user base, then the package is different. They also include other features—for example, if you have a database and you're using Siteminder, then it's good to use a Semantic-specific database, but if you are using less, then you have to purchase the database separately. Whereas if you are going for a bigger license, then it comes within the package. It depends on which plan you are using."
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Symantec Siteminder Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is highly stable and scalable
    Top Answer:The initial setup appears to be difficult in the beginning.
    Top Answer:PingAccess is used for managing access, URL management, and website management.
    Top Answer:It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate.
    Top Answer:It doesn't have a feature for... or maybe it has, but for modern authentication, like OAuth or OIDC. We haven't utilized that portion; we haven't really looked at it because our priority is LDAP… more »
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 37 in Access Management
    Views
    281
    Comparisons
    204
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    201
    Rating
    10.0
    12th
    out of 37 in Access Management
    Views
    1,772
    Comparisons
    1,349
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    298
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Single Sign-On, SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder
    Learn More
    Overview

    PingAccess is a centralized access security solution with a comprehensive policy engine. It provides secure access to applications and APIs down to the URL level, and ensures that only authorized users access the resources they need.

    Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm52%
    Transportation Company8%
    Insurance Company7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm39%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Insurance Company10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise1%
    Large Enterprise91%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise88%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise82%
    Buyer's Guide
    Access Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    PingAccess is ranked 15th in Access Management with 1 review while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 12th in Access Management with 69 reviews. PingAccess is rated 10.0, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PingAccess writes "A hybrid lightweight solution that simplifies web management ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "Easy to implement and customize and very stable". PingAccess is most compared with ForgeRock, whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with PingFederate, ForgeRock, Okta Workforce Identity, PingID and Microsoft Entra ID.

    See our list of best Access Management vendors.

    We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.