We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessAnalyzer and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Mining solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"The product was highly stable, and the data flow was very smooth."
"UiPath Process Mining is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the AI center for document understanding."
"UiPath Process Mining has a good roadmap ahead for the future."
"With Salesforce, you can identify individual tasks that are potentially consuming time within each process. You can see what process you want to automate and which task within a process will give you the most bang for your buck."
"The solution is scalable and user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the user interface, which makes it easy to use for tasks like configuring resources."
"The most valuable feature is that activities are available to us just by clicking the box, so it doesn't require much time to make changes for future requirements."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"The solution's UI and UX could be made better."
"It would be nice if UiPath's Document Understanding feature supported more languages. I don't think it supports Chinese or Japanese. We have been working in the Asia-Pacific region for a long time, and this prevents us from recommending the solution to some customers."
"Its price can be improved. They can also have a better plan for training the end users to be able to use this solution."
"The technical support for UiPath Process Mining needs some improvement."
"We encountered difficulties when trying to integrate UiPath Process Mining with SAP."
"I was involved in the deployment. It is a bit complex."
"I would like to see better integration with the Azure and AWS machine learning platforms."
"UiPath Process Mining could improve by limiting the number of updates."
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessAnalyzer is ranked 15th in Process Mining while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is rated 8.6, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessAnalyzer writes "Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". QPR ProcessAnalyzer is most compared with Celonis and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ, Minit and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. See our QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.