We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the solutions overall performance. It is very efficient and accurate for our usage."
"Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great."
"The solution offers good documentation."
"We like the performance of the product."
"As soon as it monitors all our systems and is integrated with PagerDuty, the operations team just needs to wait for alerts on their cellphones to fix things."
"The most valuable features are the dashboards and tracing."
"We use it for monitoring, identifying when services go down, or when they are outside of what we would consider normal operations."
"The most valuable feature of New Relic APM is the dashboard, New Relic Insights. I configured my own dashboard to monitor certain parameters."
"The most important thing is that it tells us where the latency in throughput and response time are."
"Support for plug-ins (RMQ, Redis etc.) is a valuable feature."
"In the next release, I would like to see the possibility of sharing the metric from this solution with other solutions."
"The end-to-end distributor tracing connectivity isn't there."
"The price needs improvement."
"I would like to see the company implement the AI auto-baseline feature which Dynatrace has."
"New Relic does enable frontend performance monitoring by default. However, when we are troubleshooting the issue, New Relic is not able to trace back to the service where the issue is. Other solutions, such as Dynatrace are better."
"The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure."
"New Relic needs to improve is the user data schema."
"The solution only supports the cloud platform and not on-premises."
"There were some settings we had issues with."
"It is very difficult to award the service level cycles at an endpoint level."
Akamai mPulse is ranked 53rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, Grafana, Datadog, AppDynamics and Sentry, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus. See our Akamai mPulse vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.