We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It helps us to reduce the cost."
"AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."
"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."
"The product provides self-healing features."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails."
"The tool gives you the flexibility to scale up and grow. The solution is also fast to deploy."
"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."
"It's scalable and expands well."
"We have a lot of teams using Splunk and they would be blind without it."
"The glass tables are very helpful."
"The most valuable features are the service analyzer and Glass Tables."
"The flexibility to develop and consolidate many solutions into one platform is great."
"In my opinion, Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is better than QRadar. With the help of Splunk, we can get results."
"The most valuable features are the agility, being able to ingest many data sources with no limitation on capacity."
"ITSI provides a visual representation of complex tools and context, using color coding and other features to make it easy for anyone at the monitoring or service desk to use."
"The only area of improvement is the speed at which servers are launched. When cleaning up to six servers at a time, it can take up to 15 to 20 minutes to launch new servers."
"The product’s security features need improvement."
"AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."
"We can have more auto scaling algorithms implemented in AWS Auto Scaling."
"In comparison to other public clouds, the product is costly."
"The problem becomes the price, as Splunk is an expensive product."
"The data recovery has room for improvement."
"Splunk ITSI consumes a lot of CPU resources."
"The end-to-end visibility in Splunk ITSI is limited and has room for improvement."
"We also faced challenges relating to UI development."
"Microservices is the only area where Splunk ITSI can be improved. When things come from one EC2 instance to another, there's a lack of exposure to microservices, so we can't know what's happening. Apart from that, it's doing pretty well."
"Predictive analytics, in terms of preventing incidents before they occur, still needs time to mature."
"Some of our customers occasionally require the development of the connectors when there are no native connectors so that we can develop in Python or for customer slash comments as well. If they could adjust that, it would be ideal."
More Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews while Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is ranked 12th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 30 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) writes "Provides great end-to-end visibility into our network environment and helped us reduce alert noise". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with , whereas Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is most compared with ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Grafana, Dynatrace, Splunk APM and BMC TrueSight Operations Management. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
