We performed a comparison between Elastic Observability and BMC TrueSight Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Based on user feedback, Elastic Observability emerges as the preferred choice over BMC TrueSight Operations Management. Elastic Observability is commended for its cost-effectiveness, licensing advantages, and extensive range of features, including machine learning capabilities. Users find it easy to deploy and customize. Overall, organizations have experienced positive outcomes and cost savings with Elastic Observability.
"The most valuable feature of BMC TrueSight Operations Management is the dashboard presentation server."
"It provides common administration, and a Single Sign-On Platform with RBAC, which eases the cross launch between multiple tools"
"It is a very stable product."
"The tool is flexible enough to be customized based on customer requirements."
"The tailoring of the knowledge modules has been particularly useful as I can streamline the agents to only report on critical events."
"It is breadth. It covers so many different technologies which can roll up into a single console."
"The major advantage of the product is estate management."
"The most valuable features of the solution are alert management, alert generation, and event management."
"Elastic APM has plenty of features, such as the Elastic server for Kibana and many additional plugins. It's a comprehensive tool when used as a logging platform."
"The ability to ensure that the data is searchable and maintainable is highly valuable for our purposes."
"The solution has been stable in our usage."
"We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical."
"The product has connectors to many services."
"The tool's most valuable feature is centralized logging. Elastic Common Search helps us to search for the logs across the organization."
"Machine learning is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The architecture and system's stability are simple."
"Reporting would be an area for improvement in TrueSight... We have almost 800 customers today on TrueSight and just under 10,000 assets. We need to be able to give a customer some information. If the customer's product fails, they'll ask us, "Did it have a problem beforehand?" We have all those events and we know all the problems it had beforehand. We have to be able to give them access to that kind of reporting. That's an enhancement that we need."
"The knowledge modules could be more lightweight in size. At present, the installation packages can be quite large."
"Application performance management (APM) is an area with certain shortcomings in the solution that needs improvement. I"
"I would really like to see out-of-the-box support for monitoring uninterruptible power supplies."
"The solution should improve predicting events and flaws in service. It also needs to improve integration with other systems."
"I definitely would like to see more improvement in the self-diagnostics. I need to know when anything is not working or collecting, long before our customer finds it."
"I think the ease of deployment needs to be looked at. It would be great if the deployment was faster and easier."
"The product must provide more AI capabilities."
"There's a steep learning curve if you've never used this solution before."
"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful."
"The cost must be made more transparent."
"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."
"Elastic Observability’s price could be improved."
"The price is the only issue in the solution. It can be made better and cheaper."
"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."
"The solution needs to use more AI. Once the product onboards AI, users would more effectively be able to track endpoints for specific messages."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 16th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 50 reviews while Elastic Observability is ranked 7th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 22 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Elastic Observability is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Observability writes "The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. ". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and New Relic, whereas Elastic Observability is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry and AppDynamics. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Elastic Observability report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.