We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Mist AI and Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN."Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We don't see many troubleshooting issues. Normally, it's a user error when it comes to the JSS or the VPN. Once they log into the system or they get on the internet, then they log directly into the JSS, so they can do their work."
"The security and the capabilities of the platform are the most valuable features."
"It's a small feature, but Cisco allows me to see access points with blinking lights. This shows me which access point is which."
"I use Cisco because of its reliability."
"The implementations are easy."
"This is the most stable product in the market."
"We found the initial setup to be straightforward."
"If you compare wired versus wireless, it's convenient. You don't need to have one place for connectivity. You can move around and it's easier. Sometimes it's a hassle to work with wires, which is why wireless is so convenient."
"Mist AI and Cloud is the best solution I have seen in the industry, especially from the artificial intelligence perspective, as it helps businesses."
"The Marvis feature of Mist AI, an artificial intelligence tool, is very useful."
"Regarding features, the solution seems to be very intuitive."
"The most useful aspect of Mist AI and Cloud is automation capabilities."
"I have a very good experience with the solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Has an extremely good feature set."
"There are several valuable features. One of them is Cibas, and another one is Marvis."
"There are a number of areas for improvement in Cisco Wireless WAN, including sensitive applications which face issues on wireless stuff and difficulty troubleshooting."
"The prices are high and should be reduced in order to be more competitive."
"Technical support could be more helpful."
"In terms of improvement, there is always something that could be enhanced. For example, we can't change wireless channels in Cisco Meraki due to a recent standard update."
"Documentation is an area that needs review. It should be more dynamic and it should be easier."
"The worst thing about the Cisco controllers is that they only have two ports."
"The pricing is a bit high."
"A lot of the time, for users, it comes down to pricing. Many would like to see it be a bit less costly."
"The solution has various licensing policies. It will be easy to use if it is an open single license."
"The solution lacks documentation."
"It would be beneficial to have support for the Chinese language."
"Mist AI and Cloud should improve its integrations."
"Sometimes it takes a lot of time for the access point to connect with the cloud."
"There seems to be different versions of standards used in the wireless access points. In the future, it would be helpful if the solution could come up with some kind of universal standard for all devices and all access points."
"The inter-functionality with other vendors was a negative for us."
"The user experience should be improved. It's not user-friendly."
Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews while Mist AI and Cloud is ranked 7th in Wireless LAN with 21 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Mist AI and Cloud is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "Widely available and has a straightforward setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mist AI and Cloud writes "A combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless, whereas Mist AI and Cloud is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, ExtremeCloud IQ and Ruckus Wireless.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.