We performed a comparison between Kandji and Microsoft Intune based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune."
"We are a remote company, and the product helps us manage the global endpoints. It helps us natively manage the endpoints in the cloud from anywhere."
"For the price, the features included with Microsoft are appealing."
"We already use a lot of Microsoft products in our company, and therefore, it made sense to also use this product."
"The main advantage is that Intune performs its intended functions effectively."
"The ability to wipe data from and reset devices is one of the most important and valuable features. If a device is reported stolen, we can freeze it or wipe the data from it, preventing data leakage."
"While I don't think you can ever have full visibility and control, Intune certainly allows us to see the applications being used and tells us if things like Windows patches aren't applied to machines. It does a good job. That visibility makes life a little easier."
"The aspects I find most valuable are the managing the data and applications. I can also restrict the users to install any applications. I can also wipe the data if the phone was missplaced or stolen. These are the basics for me."
"Kandji should give open customization."
"Microsoft Intune fails a lot when it comes to device compliance."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"While Intune works perfectly well, the only potential downside is that the deployment could be a bit complex for some users."
"I would like to see the ability to deploy custom packages as a Windows 64-bit package, as opposed to the Windows 32-bit, which is the only one available now."
"There are a couple of issues with stability."
"Microsoft Intune is not user-friendly to manage and has room for improvement."
"They can improve their MAM policies a little bit more and make them more granular. They should include more granular group policies. They are there, but they need to be more granular. Its stability should also be improved. It is not very stable. Sometimes, it shows some inconsistencies across tenants."
"Some enrollment features could be improved."
Kandji is ranked 18th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review while Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 165 reviews. Kandji is rated 7.0, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Kandji writes "An easy-to-manage and deploy solution, but it should provide open customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Kandji is most compared with Jamf Pro, CrowdStrike Falcon, Open EDR and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.