We compared Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Entra ID based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Entra ID both offer valuable features such as efficient device management and seamless authentication processes. Intune focuses on security measures and integration with enterprise systems, while Entra ID emphasizes user-friendly interfaces and platform integration. Users praise Intune for its prompt customer service and cost-effectiveness, while Entra ID users appreciate its affordability and efficiency. However, Intune users suggest improvements in user interface and performance, while Entra ID users seek enhancements in UI design and customization options.
Features: Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Entra ID have different valuable features. Intune offers data wipe and device reset, integration with enterprise systems, and control over user access. Entra ID focuses on user-friendly interface, efficient authentication, and seamless integration with platforms.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Microsoft Intune is praised for its reasonable pricing and cost-effectiveness. Users find the licensing options to be flexible and accommodating. On the other hand, users have expressed a positive sentiment towards Microsoft Entra ID's pricing, setup cost, and licensing. They appreciate the affordability, competitive pricing, and user-friendly setup process. The licensing options are also seen as flexible and suitable for various needs and budgets., The ROI from Microsoft Intune demonstrated effective cost management, increased productivity, secure device management, streamlined workflows, seamless integration, time savings, enhanced user experience, and improved security measures. On the other hand, Microsoft Entra ID offers significant cost savings, improved efficiency, streamlined business processes, and increased productivity.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Intune could improve its user interface, speed, customization options, and troubleshooting features. On the other hand, Microsoft Entra ID needs enhancements in its user interface, optimization for different devices, usability, sign-up process, customization options, and security features.
Deployment and customer support: The users' reviews for Microsoft Intune indicate that the duration to establish the tech solution can vary, with some users reporting separate phases of deployment and setup, while others consider both terms to refer to the same period. On the other hand, Microsoft Entra ID user reviews also show variability in the duration required, with some users reporting distinct deployment and setup phases, and others considering them as one., The customer service provided by Microsoft Intune is highly praised for its prompt assistance and knowledgeable support staff. Customers value feeling supported throughout their interactions. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID's customer service is highlighted for its exceptional efficiency, reliability, and helpfulness. The support team is praised for their friendliness, professionalism, and effective communication, ensuring seamless problem resolution.
The summary above is based on 193 interviews we conducted recently with Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Entra ID users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"A couple of features are valuable, but the one that comes across the most to me is multi-factor authentication."
"The tool's most valuable features are security and integration with other tenants."
"Privilege identity management is the most valuable feature."
"It's an easy product to maintain."
"It is great for mom-and-pop shops or small businesses that are truly coming into the enterprise ecosystem and that have not come from a legacy environment."
"The performance is good."
"The solution has some great features, such as identity governance, and user self-service. The Outlook application is very good and is used by a lot of people even if they are using Google services."
"It certainly centralizes usernames, and it certainly centralizes credentials. Companies have different tolerances for synchronizing those credentials versus redirecting to on-prem. The use case of maturing into the cloud helps from a SaaS adoption standpoint, and it also tends to be the jumping-off point for larger organizations to start doing PaaS and infrastructure as a service. So, platform as a service and infrastructure as a service kind of dovetail off the Active Directory synchronization piece and the email and SharePoint. It becomes a natural step for people, who wouldn't normally do infrastructure as a service, because they're already exposed to this, and they have already set up their email and SharePoint there. All of the components are there."
"The feature I like the most is that we can perform remote tasks. If we want to retire or wipe out personal data or corporate data from a device, we can use Microsoft Intune remotely, and with the click of a button, data is removed automatically. Nothing needs to be done from the end-user side."
"Remote Wipe and Autopilot is one of the best features."
"We have found the solution is capable of scaling."
"Intune is effective because of the configuration management and endpoint security it provides. The graphical interface makes it easier to configure and deploy devices."
"The technical support of Microsoft Intune is good."
"We are a remote company, and the product helps us manage the global endpoints. It helps us natively manage the endpoints in the cloud from anywhere."
"We have one MDM that works with Windows, iOS, and Android."
"It's really easy to access."
"For example, there were some authentication features that, for security purposes, had certain limitations. Those limitations still exist, but the portal now has options so that the customers can make custom features to manage their identity."
"The cost of licensing always has room for improvement."
"To look at more documentation, engineering, or an open standard would be nice."
"The documentation could be better."
"The product could be more cost-effective."
"It doesn't function the same way as an Active Directory inside of an infrastructure, that is, a physical infrastructure. In the cloud, it is all flat. That's one of the disadvantages."
"Many people believe that the Azure Active Directory is overly complicated and antiquated."
"We have a custom solution now running to tie all those Azure ADs together. We use the B2B functionality for that. Improvements are already on the roadmap for Azure AD in that area. I think they will make it easier to work together between two different tenants in Azure AD, because normally one tenant is a security boundary. For example, company one has a tenant and company two has a tenant, and then you can do B2B collaboration between those, but it is still quite limited. For our use case, it is enough currently. However, if we want to extend the collaboration even further, then we need an easier way to collaborate between two tenants, but I think that is already on the roadmap of Azure AD anyway."
"The UI also needs improvements because it is complex for end-users. We have had feedback from a few users in our organization who found the UI is not feasible for tracking and analyzing all the processes and monitoring all the devices."
"There should be more focus on mobile device security and integration."
"Microsoft Intune lags market leaders, such as Apperian, in its MAM capabilities."
"An area for improvement is the absence of seamless integration, particularly with external dashboards."
"Microsoft Intune could enhance its patch management for various devices, ensuring regular updates and tracking of device privileges."
"There is improvement needed in integrating with the installed Office solutions versions, such as Office 2019. The Office 365 integrates without a problem."
"There should be more support for macOS. Even though macOS is supported by Intune and Microsoft is working very hard to get more features into Intune to manage macOS, that's one thing they can give a lot more attention to."
"There can be some added features, such as an improved dashboard. Any new feature that could be a benefit to our customers would be good."
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 4th in Microsoft Security Suite with 190 reviews while Microsoft Intune is ranked 3rd in Microsoft Security Suite with 165 reviews. Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Allows users to authenticate from home and has excellent integrations in a simple, stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco Duo, Okta Workforce Identity and Yubico YubiKey, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl and IBM MaaS360. See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Microsoft Intune report.
See our list of best Microsoft Security Suite vendors.
We monitor all Microsoft Security Suite reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
In recent years Microsoft has really upped its game with Defender and Intune. As core cyber-security for an SME, keeping just to Microsoft is now a real option. The challenge is understanding the gaps / cyber security service weaknesses (if they exist) in comparison with other vendors such as ESET, Malwarebytes, Trend Micro, etc.
Azure AD Services, Defender for Endpoint, and Intune are all Microsoft products, but it is important to understand how each product works as they may not be compatible and there may be some limitations.
Devices managed through Intune may not have all of the Defender for Endpoint features. Some advanced features such as automated investigation and remediation may only be available for devices that are enrolled in Defender for Endpoint standalone.
In addition, Azure AD and Intune have different requirements for device enrollment and management. Intune requires devices to be enrolled and managed through an MDM solution, while Azure AD provides basic device management capabilities but may not support all of the features available in Intune.
Lastly, there may be limitations to how user identities and access are managed between Azure AD and Intune. Some features that are available in Azure AD, such as conditional access policies, may not suit Intune, and additional configuration may be required to ensure that user identities and access are properly managed across both services.
If anyone out there has other experiences, please let me know!
It depends on your company's infrastructure. Check with your cyber team whether you can sync your endpoints to Cloud using Azure AD as Azure Registered/ Azure Hybrid AD join/ Azure AD join, etc.
1. So, if the ask is only to enroll them in Intune to leverage defender/BitLocker services - go directly to Azure AD's join approach.
2. If you still want to manage patch management/mcm BitLocker but Defender via cloud, the approach should be Azure Hybrid AD join.
3. You can still use autopilot using both of these approaches.
I believe it is a good first step, and I would say even a requirement, but in no way is it a comprehensive security solution, even for endpoints.
There are many things that need to be addressed for security. In addition to this, there is XDR, MDR, more comprehensive AV for endpoints & Servers that stop attacks, Threat Hunting, Mitigation, PEN Testing, Security Training for end users, Multi-Factor Authentication (Microsoft's MFA is good but only for Microsoft products), Patch Management for Endpoints, Servers and Cloud Workloads, Network Access Control, Firewalls for On-Premise and Cloud server workloads, Network Segmentation, Password Management, Data Backups (3-2-1-1 Rule) with Immutable Backups, Power Backups, Physical Security, Monitoring, NOC/SOC services, and working towards a Zero Trust architecture...
But there are no single-point solutions that will make you secure, so don't get complacent. And you can outspend your profits if you do everything. Just remember it's best to have a layered approach that works together and looks at everything from a security perspective and how it integrates with your overall security plans and objectives to help identify holes and possible mitigations.
Healthcare must do Risk Assessments by law, but I recommend that all companies of all sizes do at least annual risk assessments since there is so such thing as being too small or inconspicuous to be hit with malware or have a cyber security attack since much of the delivery is automated and not just by the script-kiddies of years gone by... Nation States are actively engaging in cyber warfare daily, along with terrorists, and opportunists looking to make big money from you...