We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"Security for malware and threats is the most valuable feature."
"The cloud console is good and the tool is effective in protection."
"The most valuable features of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security are remote administration and deployment, comprehensive firewall protection, malware protection, and antivirus."
"What I appreciate most about Bitdefender are its web content filtering, blocking malicious sites, and its ability to thwart brute force attacks on open ports."
"We find the protection the solution provides valuable."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lot of telemetry that allows me to really see what's going on with the device."
"The most valuable feature is the IDS."
"The product offers an opportunity to monitor the things happening in our network. It also has a comprehensive dashboard."
"All of our devices are integrated with the solution."
"The most valuable features are the sandbox, mail scanning, sandboxing attachments, files, and that it responds to VPN porting."
"The product is good and has a good interface."
"It can scale as well."
"ESET Endpoint Security is stable, I did not have any issues with it."
"The most valuable features of this solution are, of course, the IPS/IDS, Intrusion Prevention, Intrusion Detection, and Antivirus."
"Installing and integrating ESET Endpoint Antivirus was easy. It prevents worms, malware, and Trojans."
"It has been working fine. It lets you know when it finds things. We didn't have any incident where the place had to shut down or was taken over by anything. We haven't had any issues that we know of."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The initial setup should be made easier."
"The live monitoring service from Bitdefender's center is expensive and has room for improvement."
"My main concern is that it's a bit heavy for some devices. Like Kaspersky or McAfee, it uses more RAM or memory. Similar to that, it causes issues for users and their own resources, similar to that. If you deploy on old legacy devices with only 1GB of RAM, then it could be a problem."
"The risk management tool does not have reporting, which I feel to be a huge mistake."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security could improve the RDP, I have problems sometimes."
"Machines with low memory and CPU may experience slow performance."
"The firewall capabilities could benefit from an upgrade since it lacks a high level of granularity and control."
"They've got all this training that's available, but it involves stuff that doesn't really encompass the solution as a whole."
"The product should provide a one-click option to renew the licenses."
"We do get false positives."
"I'm unsure as to if they could actually support a large enterprise."
"The stability needs to be improved. There are bugs that you have to deal with."
"They could improve the solution by adding better ransomware features."
"Data Leak Protection is is what we are searching for at the moment. It is not included with ESET."
"The initial setup of ESET Endpoint Security can be complicated when you get involved with encryption."
"The solution lacks the automation I need."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is ranked 28th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 23 reviews while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 9th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 99 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is rated 8.2, while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security writes "Gives a good snapshot of what's going on". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is most compared with HP Wolf Security, Seqrite Endpoint Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and SonicWall Capture Client, whereas ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Seqrite Endpoint Security. See our Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.