We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The most valuable features of the solution are case management, routing, and low-code environment."
"It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs."
"Fast prototyping."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the various workflows."
"There is a feature to accelerate the development so that business analysts can directly create their user stories and assign the task to the developers."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"Can do a lot of things with minimum time and cost."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"First-time customers will find its licensing tricky. The technical support team for this solution could be faster in resolving tickets."
"The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother."
"Lack of stronger cloud support is somewhat inconvenient for users and implementation."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved."
"Pega is claiming they're into low code but as per Gartner Magic Quadrant, Pega is not there now."
"Its implementation in the public sector was a bit complex."
"It needs more integration with other platforms."
KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Camunda, Nintex Process Platform and Appian, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and Microsoft Power Apps. See our KiSSFLOW vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Rapid Application Development Software vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.