We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Sophos EPP Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is stable and scalable."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The solution has all the standard features you would expect for endpoint protection."
"The zero-day threat prevention is excellent."
"SandBlast Agent is always working in the background collecting sensitive data, forensics, and notifying users whenever there is a chance of a brute-force attack into our systems. Otherwise, it has been protecting our data at various geographies along with the endpoints that we set up on the cloud. They have been able to filter out or thwart any attacks from the very word, "Go," and make our work very safe and smooth."
"The solution has good threat intelligence features."
"It offers complete endpoint protection for all assets."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the VPN."
"Administratively, it's easy to control."
"The most valuable feature is Harmony Endpoint's encapsulation system which captures the whole system and protects it against other functions. It is really good for the Check Point Harmony specialists."
"Sophos EPP Suite is a powerful antivirus."
"The most valuable feature is the central administration and management."
"The product’s ease of deployment is its best feature."
"With Sophos, the scanning of viruses and scanning of the disk is done silently in the background."
"In terms of the Firewall, the EAP assist, the simple interface and the reporting features are quite good for clients. It's very easy to understand and to navigate the Dashboard."
"If you want something simple to work with, Sophos makes it very simple for you to use."
"The performance and scalability are impressive. We can install it on various computers."
"The most valuable feature is data loss prevention."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The support needs improvement."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"Its guides are identical to the existing ones. These guides should be updated and they should improve their design."
"We would like to have the ability to stop and restart the service remotely, which is something that we can do easily with Symantec but have a hard time with when using Check Point."
"Specifically, there are gaps when it comes to security."
"Infinity Portal sometimes requires more performance."
"Legacy VPNs and digital footprints should be minimized."
"We cannot integrate this product with other solutions, which is something that should be improved."
"We use a couple of Check Point products, like SmartEvent, and SandBlast Agent is not really integrated into that. We haven't gotten the reports working yet. We are working with the account team and trying. As I said, it's still relatively new in terms of what we're trying to achieve."
"It would be ideal if they had a migration tool of some sort."
"Sophos is lacking in the granularity of optimization, so having more control would be better."
"Sophos EPP Suite's support services need improvement."
"Sometimes there are issues with the antivirus back logs."
"The encryption features are not as good as McAfee's."
"The logging issues must be fixed."
"The product is not secured and doesn't offer a fast connection."
"There could be enhancements made to the DLP."
"The solution could be more stable."
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 104 reviews while Sophos EPP Suite is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 55 reviews. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.8, while Sophos EPP Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Excellent anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, and web browsing filtering". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos EPP Suite writes "The solution provides endpoint detection and response with a nice-looking dashboard". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Sophos EPP Suite is most compared with Seqrite Endpoint Security, Trend Micro Deep Security, Trellix Endpoint Security, Coro and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection. See our Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Sophos EPP Suite report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.