We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services."
"The product has efficient connectors."
"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"The solution is very easy for new users because it includes very good documentation and transparency."
"One special aspect of Azure Logic Apps is its easy integration of various applications, especially when connectors are already available. For instance, there are connectors for database applications and systems like SAP. You can drag and drop the connectors to complete your integration quickly."
"If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."
"The prebuilt connectors available for SAP are really useful."
"I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."
"It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors."
"I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."
"The solution could add an AI version to make it easier for people."
"The stability of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is stable. However, we have had some issues in the past. They do resolve issues that arise from new releases."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could have more customization options for connectors."
"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."
"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 9th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 4 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "Handles a wide variety of data sources and efficiently organizes and manages integration processes". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi iPaaS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and TIBCO Cloud Integration, whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Zapier and Jitterbit Harmony . See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.