We performed a comparison between CylancePROTECT and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"It secures different entry points into the network."
"Does malware analysis. Blocks WannaCry and other attacks that have come out."
"It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions."
"CylancePROTECT works on AI technology, is always up to date, and uses very few resources on your devices."
"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."
"The deployment of updates is easy."
"It actively monitors the behavior and activity of processes and will, without hesitation, terminate at root anything it determines to be suspect."
"What's most valuable in CylancePROTECT is the optics feature. I also like its easy-to-use and user-friendly dashboard and monitoring system."
"Communication with all Mcafee products (also 3rd parties) by DXL infrastructure."
"I feel McAfee Endpoint Security to be a good, mature product."
"We can manage everything from the central console and it is very easy."
"The product is fairly reliable."
"The most valuable feature of Trellix Endpoint Security is containment, which takes less than a minute."
"The user behavioral analysis feature is great."
"McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection is stable. We don't have any bugs being reported."
"Dynamic Application Containment."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"It is hard to manage."
"It needs real analysis of quarantined files. The EDR product isn't showing much right now."
"The management console needs a little maturity in how it presents data and allows the administrator to drill down or search across systems."
"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."
"The company that sells us the licenses sometimes doesn't know how to do certain things."
"The solution should implement AI in the product."
"The solution needs better dashboards that are easier to use."
"The product needs to continue to offer better alerts. In particular, around false positives. It needs to reduce them from happening."
"The resolution time should be faster."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
"Patch management is unavailable"
"Some agents become old and then they don't communicate well any longer."
"It would be nice if the solution were to allow not just on-cloud management, but on-premises, as well."
"The initial setup isn't so easy. You need to know what you are doing."
"The interface is complex."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
CylancePROTECT is ranked 23rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 41 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Symantec Endpoint Security, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.