We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and SAP Mobile Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."It is a very helpful solution."
"The most valuable feature for us is the security, including risk analysis and patch management."
"The dashboards, the security, and the customization capabilities work very well for us."
"It's easy to manage."
"The ability to send configurations to our systems is valuable, particularly as we don't have a regular Windows AD server. Our current environment doesn't have a Windows AD, which limits our ability to push GPOs. However, this is where the solution can step in and help us push policies."
"It works pretty well for us."
"The tool's most valuable feature is Autopilot."
"It is a comprehensive security solution that not only controls access to enterprise resources but also tracks and prevents unauthorized access, ensuring the protection of sensitive data and preventing potential data loss scenarios."
"The most valuable feature is the fact that we can find a lost device or shut the device down and wipe it is good for HIPAA."
"Mobile Device Configuration with policy applying: This significantly reduces time of device configuration."
"Remote enablement feature and access to internal resources on the VPN."
"It can change policies based on geolocation or schedules."
"Asset management is the most valuable feature and integral for device inventory."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"Using this solution has made things more convenient. Earlier, we had to depend a lot more on IT to find and resolve our issues."
"It helped us reduce the number of support incidents by limiting users' access to device configurations."
"The initial setup is not overly complex."
"It's not that difficult to set up."
"Two of the very fascinating features that make SAP Mobile Platform stand out from other platforms are its offline capability and integration capability."
"Technical support is helpful."
"Both platforms, the SAP Mobile Platform, and SAP, are highly valuable for our company because they facilitate integration, which can be expensive. It's very convenient to connect and create billing accounts through the SAP Mobile Platform."
"One valuable feature of SAP Mobile Platform is its enterprise-grade standard and maintained APIs, available out of the box for easy integration with various systems."
"I would like some integration with the Microsoft reporting platform Power BI."
"Onboarding of endpoint devices is not straightforward. The onboarding process was a little heavier than I thought it would be. That's the key improvement area. Obviously, the more control you have over the devices, the better it is."
"No option to do end-to-en macOS management. Slow implementation of policies."
"Intune doesn't provide much control over Windows servers. It's something we struggle with."
"Intune could add more Linux security features and more integration with on-prem devices. The application deployments can also be improved."
"The reporting and cost have room for improvement."
"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."
"From a new user's perspective, it may be a little overwhelming because there are quite a few things to look at in the console, however, once you are sort of acclimated and are familiar with your core functions, it's fairly simple and straightforward."
"The user experience really isn't so good."
"An area for improvement would be handshaking with Microsoft in terms of trying to get a DLP on Microsoft OS."
"The user interface could definitely use some improvement."
"It would be ideal to add support for the distribution of windows.exe applications."
"Can be added process of export/import environment configuration to simplify any migration processes."
"User interface is basic and not very intuitive."
"We opted to go with Microsoft Intune because it just seemed to be a more mature and comprehensive enterprise solution, whereas IBM MaaS360 didn't seem to have the necessary breadth to manage all of our equipment. Along with laptops, I've had some BYODs. IBM MaaS360 just didn't seem as mature in our assessment."
"The reporting and alerting could be improved."
"If it was low code or no code it would be ideal."
"The cost of the SAP Mobile Platform is high, and there is room for improvement in its pricing."
"The toolkit to develop front end applications, especially native applications, is not that good."
"One drawback is that SAP Mobile Platform apps are only available through the browser, making offline capability more challenging to implement."
"SAP has announced that they'll be ending the support on the SAP platform."
"The licensing model is a bit dated."
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while SAP Mobile Platform is ranked 12th in Mobile Development Platforms with 7 reviews. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while SAP Mobile Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Mobile Platform writes "Flexible, well-designed, and offers good scalability". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with SOTI MobiControl, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, IBM MobileFirst and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), whereas SAP Mobile Platform is most compared with OutSystems, Android SDK, Ionic and IBM MobileFirst.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.