We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"I can have a SharePoint list and connect with users through PowerApps to present the information."
"We like that this solution allows us to fully define our test environments, and link them using different code. This means we can do different tests, but with one basic structure, and then export the data and use it in other platforms."
"Ability to generate QR codes and scan barcodes."
"I like the galleries, which are really powerful."
"The solution is easy to use and map."
"Microsoft PowerApps allows you to simplify business processes and user experience. You can also create responsive applications and canvas apps through this solution. It's an easy to scale, stable, and low-code solution."
"There are a lot of different applications; you can connect PowerApps, or Flow, or Power BI to many different types of applications to interchange data."
"The solution becomes easier the set up once you get used to it."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"I have heard from developers that there is documentation missing in the reporting."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities in the future."
"When we talk of integrating with external applications, that's one area where, even today, I had to loop in my code developers. If this area can be streamlined so that my techno-functional consultants, who are on-site, can immediately start working on something without the assistance of developers, that would be ideal."
"Can be improved to cater to complex developments."
"The scalability of the solution could improve."
"PowerApps is still a bit new compared to a slightly more mature product such as OutSystems."
"The pricing structure needs to be improved, the current information is confusing."
"One area where the solution lacks is the limited size of the database it offers its users."
AgilePoint is ranked 23rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 5 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". AgilePoint is most compared with Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform, Camunda and IBM BPM, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and OutSystems. See our AgilePoint vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.