We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"The solution is good for data models."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
AgilePoint is ranked 32nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". AgilePoint is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform and IBM BPM, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our AgilePoint vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
