We performed a comparison between Akamai Enterprise Application Access and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The capability of Akamai Enterprise Application Access is what you're looking for, it's giving you the service that you're looking for. It's simple and doesn't use an agent. It uses LCSD responders, and they have a lot of services around the globe. That's the reason that we were very interested in using it because it has a lot of coverage. This is because it's under the GDS umbrella."
"The solution is very convenient and stable because you don't have to worry about attacks to public IPs or public networks."
"Application Access's most valuable feature is the accessibility of enterprise tech protection."
"We do not need to learn anything new to use the product."
"The latest versions of the managed Kubernetes clusters are good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use."
"It's reliable."
"There is a certain accessibility feature that I can set using a cloud identity, which is really valuable to us."
"It is easy to integrate, especially if I consider the fact that it gives me a single dashboard where I have all the applications or apps displayed."
"The most valuable features of the Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy are file storage, a collaborative environment, and easy access."
"The platform’s most valuable features include storage, machine, and cloud functionality."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"We need another approach to bring the solution to the cloud. In addition to Access Management, we would like to see if we can jump into Directories. I think ADs are going to go away and everything is going to be cloud-based and minimize the use of ADs because of the cost and some other dependencies to the cloud. Every time you buy AD it is more hardware, and everything's changing to software. The network's changing, the applications are changing, and for IT it is hard to keep up with it."
"The technical enablement sessions are quite limited, and Akamai could help by providing more of them."
"The solution has two agents so should combine its enterprise application and security access into one agent."
"Stability-wise, the service could be improved."
"I think this product needs to shift the focus from our software, our solution, like social media analytics to our customers; not maintenance in the hardware."
"The solution's security should be improved."
"The solution is a bit complex and could be made easier to use."
"The product’s migration process could be easier to understand."
"We encounter issues while setting up emails for the solution."
"The tool's grouping option layout and cost are areas of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution's AI integration could be improved."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
More Akamai Enterprise Application Access Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Akamai Enterprise Application Access is ranked 14th in ZTNA as a Service with 3 reviews while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 6th in ZTNA with 44 reviews. Akamai Enterprise Application Access is rated 9.0, while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Akamai Enterprise Application Access writes "Very scalable, convenient, and stable protection against attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". Akamai Enterprise Application Access is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Zscaler Internet Access, Appgate SDP, Netskope and Cloudflare Access, whereas Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Cisco Duo. See our Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy report.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.