We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services."The solution is secure."
"The reliability of storage is the main benefit."
"It is the most feature-rich platform."
"We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign."
"The product is easy to use."
"I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in a simpler manner."
"We save money with the product."
"The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally."
"The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful."
"The product needs to improve cloud security."
"Amazon S3 Glacier's data retrieval time is slow compared to other AWS storage services and should be improved."
"The solution's cloud storage is very expensive, and users may not be able to afford cloud storage."
"Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand."
"I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection."
"The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The solution's cost optimization could be improved."
"We'd like the solution to be less expensive and offer lower latency."
Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 1 review. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS writes "Great migrations, useful integrations, and offers good data replication". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is most compared with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.