We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services."The solution auto-scales so it is easily scalable."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon S3 is the data transfer acceleration because it can enable fast, easy, and secure data transfer."
"The most valuable feature is the sharing capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon S3 is storage, which provides a personal capacity."
"Amazon S3's best features are its reliability and capacity to expand."
"We find the archival capabilities of this solution quite valuable, because we can have set policies of exactly when, and what to archive."
"The most valuable features are VNet, virtual machines, and Elastic Kubernetes Service."
"The most valuable feature is the storage."
"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."
"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."
"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."
"We would like Amazon to reduce the price of storage."
"Maybe it could be a bit cheaper."
"Could include some additional security features."
"The security model can be improved as it is a bit confusing."
"I would like to see an easier setup that doesn't require as much training."
"We need the mapping to Windows. That feature is needed in S3. That feature is in the Azure cloud where we can map it like a drive. We can map the cloud storage to the effort driving our Windows PC. But Amazon is not providing that feature for the S3 solution."
"The read drive speed is not as fast as it should be."
"The major challenge is the inability to create more than ten policies."
"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."
"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."
"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."
Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 68 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". Amazon S3 is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage and Wasabi, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Microsoft Azure Object Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service, Google Cloud Storage and Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store).
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
