Amazon S3 vs Wasabi comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
8,712 views|5,262 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Wasabi Technologies Logo
3,970 views|2,599 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 vs. Wasabi Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You don't have to specify your clone, availability clone, or your locations. Everything's over there. They have a receipt for the instance where we have to select the exact location of what we are clicking. The S3 storage capacity is high, and the price is reasonable.""We find the archival capabilities of this solution quite valuable, because we can have set policies of exactly when, and what to archive.""The tool helps us with data backup storage of payment files and helps us avoid issues with clients when we miss the data. For instance, in the payment file of my Google client, you can find details of one-to-one transactions like the payment information on the file header, payment ID, payment client ID, group headers, etc. We get these details into the file format of ISO which is the accepted format at JP Morgan & Chase. Once we get the file format, we process it through S3.""What I found most valuable in Amazon S3 is its versioning feature. I also like that you can create pre-signed URLs on the solution.""Amazon S3's best features are its reliability and capacity to expand.""I used Amazon AWS/S3 solution to prove my concept before deploying it on real hardware. It was a great experience and was really scalable.""The most valuable feature of Amazon S3 is its flexibility as a solution to suit many different use cases.""The most valuable features of Amazon S3 are the performance and hibernation data options. Additionally, there is a feature that provides faster website access that is helpful."

More Amazon S3 Pros →

"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them.""The tool is very user-friendly.""The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost.""The initial setup is straightforward.""Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly.""The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups.""Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."

More Wasabi Pros →

Cons
"I would also like S3 to have the ability to do dynamic websites without the need to do reconfigurations outside of S3. You should be able to switch on dynamic websites in S3, and then it works. I shouldn't need to go elsewhere within Amazon Web Services to get a dynamic website to work.""The upload speed for data and documents is sometimes slow.""The installation could be more straightforward for inexperienced users.""The pricing and licensing are pretty complex.""Could include some additional security features.""The solution could improve by having a simpler way to have the detail size of a file in the CLI to be read or understood easier. Today, it's a little raw in the way the details are presented. You have to make some scripts and some modifications to be able to see the information properly of the size of a given bucket or the size of a file.""I would like to see an easier setup that doesn't require as much training.""Sometimes we have to concentrate networks to a certain location, like the EU, for example. Therefore, if we set S3 in the EU region from the Middle East or Africa, the latency is an issue and we find it hard to connect to that S3."

More Amazon S3 Cons →

"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved.""I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve.""Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent.""The solution’s user reporting could be improved.""The solution must allow the extension of the retention period.""The scalability could improve.""The scalability could be improved."

More Wasabi Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "With S3 Standard, there is not a charge for deletion of objects."
  • "This solution has reasonable pricing and a low cost."
  • "The licensing is pay as you go, and I'm happy with the pricing."
  • "The cost of storage is cheap. However, the cost to have a better interface can get expensive. We are using Athena for this purpose and if we did some heavy queries the cost will start adding up. When the Athena query is running, it will scan the bucket and they charge for how many GBs we are going to scan. The function of scanning has a lot of costs attached to it, this is a negative point."
  • "The price of the Amazon S3 is low. The license model is based on what you use."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 depends on various variables. However, the price overall is fair."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 could be less expensive."
  • "The license of Amazon S3 is based on volume, capacity, and time. The overall price of the solution could improve. The support has to be added if you want it at an additional cost."
  • More Amazon S3 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're employing, and that type of thing."
  • "Wasabi is a cost-effective solution for data storage, priced at just under six dollars per terabyte."
  • "The price of the solution is inexpensive."
  • "Wasabi has better pricing than Nutanix."
  • "Wasabi is a cheap solution, and users have to pay for a monthly license."
  • "The tool’s price is very reasonable."
  • "The price is reasonable."
  • More Wasabi Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon S3 is very flexible and provides high storage.
    Top Answer:The solution is cost-effective because it is based on a pay-as-you-go model, where I can purchase and use it according to my needs.
    Top Answer:No direct connector is available to connect Amazon S3 with other tools like MicroStrategy. So, I have to use a third party and connect to it.
    Top Answer:The tool is very user-friendly.
    Top Answer:We can reserve capacities based on our usage expectations for two to three years. We can pay for it annually. It is quite easy for the organization. The pricing model is quite affordable. The price is… more »
    Top Answer:The solution must allow the extension of the retention period. Depending on the use case, the retention period can hamper us. We understand the importance of the retention period when we compare it to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    8,712
    Comparisons
    5,262
    Reviews
    49
    Average Words per Review
    377
    Rating
    8.8
    Views
    3,970
    Comparisons
    2,599
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    412
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    S3, Simple Storage Service
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

    Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.

    Wasabi makes saving data simple, affordable, fast and secure. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage removes the complicated decision of where, how and whether to save your data, and empowers you to transform your business and organization through cost savings and disruptive speed and performance.

    Sample Customers
    Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
    FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Real Estate/Law Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization68%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    Construction Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise72%
    Large Enterprise21%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business88%
    Large Enterprise13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon S3 vs. Wasabi
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Wasabi and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 68 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Zadara, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Amazon S3 vs. Wasabi report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.