We performed a comparison between Anypoint MQ and IBM MQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very scalable with solid performance and the capability of extending it using any custom Java in case you don't have anything out of the box. MDP is strong. It is good compared to other products regarding its capabilities in managing or orchestrating the issue load."
"It's easy to use and comes as a bundle package with the Anypoint Platform, removing the need for any complex setup."
"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."
"The use of ACK is valuable."
"Good interface, simple to use and stable."
"We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful."
"Initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment is a cakewalk."
"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."
"Technical support is quite helpful."
"The product helps us monitor messages with other queues, view duplicated messages and control undelivered messages."
"We use our routing feature when the request is coming from the business application. The request goes to the distributive side and it is routed to the right claim instance."
"The clusterization which results in persistence is the most valuable feature."
"I like the architecture it provides seamlessly for assured delivery."
"The usability of the solution is very good."
"A stable and reliable software that offers good integration between different systems."
"Clustering is one of its most valuable features."
"Anypoint MQ could improve the user interface."
"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."
"Information on monitoring could be improved."
"When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward."
"Anypoint MQ's capabilities are mainly used for messaging purposes, but it doesn't have typical use cases that extend as far as other Message Queue software."
"The product does not provide a priority level for the message."
"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."
"There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."
"Scalability is lacking compared to the cloud native products coming into the market."
"IBM HQ's scalability isn't the best."
"I would like the ability to connect with some of the more recent offerings, such as API Connect; being able to publish our MQ endpoints, the queues, the messaging infrastructure as IT assets."
"More documentation would be good because some features are not deeply implemented."
"The issue is that they're using a very old clustering model."
"It would be great if the dashboard had additional features like a board design."
"The main issue we are having with the solution is due to the connection dropouts which have been going on for a long time now."
"You should be able to increase the message size. It should be dynamic. Each queue has a limitation of 5,000."
Anypoint MQ is ranked 7th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 10 reviews while IBM MQ is ranked 2nd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 158 reviews. Anypoint MQ is rated 7.0, while IBM MQ is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Anypoint MQ writes "Useful for asynchronous messaging, but it lacks features, and the storage is limited". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method". Anypoint MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Amazon SQS, VMware RabbitMQ and PubSub+ Event Broker, whereas IBM MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ, Red Hat AMQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service. See our Anypoint MQ vs. IBM MQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
