We performed a comparison between Anypoint MQ and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Good interface, simple to use and stable."
"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."
"It's easy to use and comes as a bundle package with the Anypoint Platform, removing the need for any complex setup."
"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."
"We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful."
"Initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment is a cakewalk."
"The use of ACK is valuable."
"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."
"We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another."
"Very fast for query processing."
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
"Reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff."
"Scalable (Massive) Parallel Processing (MPP) – The ability to bring to bear large amounts of compute against large data sets with Greenplum and the EMC DCA has proven itself to be very effective."
"It's super easy to deploy and it also supports different languages and analytics."
"It's one of the fastest databases in the market. It's easy to use. From a maintenance perspective it's a good product. The segmentation, or architecture of the product is different than other databases such as Oracle. So even in 10 years, the data distribution for such segments will not affect other segments. The query performance of the product, for complex queries, is very good. It has good integration with Hadoop."
"The most valuable feature for us is horizontal scaling."
"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."
"Information on monitoring could be improved."
"When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward."
"There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."
"The product does not provide a priority level for the message."
"The customer service is not good enough"
"Anypoint MQ's capabilities are mainly used for messaging purposes, but it doesn't have typical use cases that extend as far as other Message Queue software."
"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."
"Initial setup is a little complex. It took around two weeks to deploy."
"Extra filters would be helpful."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."
"The product is pretty hard to configure."
"The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"VMware RabbitMQ needs to create a new queue system."
Anypoint MQ is ranked 7th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 10 reviews while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 81 reviews. Anypoint MQ is rated 7.0, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Anypoint MQ writes "Useful for asynchronous messaging, but it lacks features, and the storage is limited". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Anypoint MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Amazon SQS, IBM MQ and PubSub+ Event Broker, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with IBM MQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ, ActiveMQ and Oracle Exadata. See our Anypoint MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Services report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
