We performed a comparison between Apache Subversion and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."
"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is you can see the differences between the fresh code and the old code before you merge. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and well-integrated."
"The planning model is good, and so is the suite of applications around it."
"The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it is has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
"Bitbucket is a standard source code repository with all the features you would expect. It supports Git and SVN. It's an extensive tool that provides us with merging, branching, and change management capabilities. You can compare the changes with the current and previous versions."
"Bitbucket is an integral part of our CI/CD project."
"Bitbucket's most valuable feature is the web interface, which is useful compared to other tools, has a lot of features, and is intuitive."
"Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting."
"You can use Bitbucket to whitelist IP addresses during deployment."
"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is CLI."
"In future releases, more integration is always a valuable aspect to consider."
"When users are given access for the first time, they should have some basic setups to help them specify their purposes."
"I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support."
"We need an improved automation feature for the cloud."
"Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash."
"Bitbucket should come with code review pre-integrated, which would be better than integrating another tool into the solution."
"The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved."
"The tool offers a limited pipeline structure."
Apache Subversion is ranked 9th in Version Control with 4 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Subversion writes "Centralized repository, but the stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Apache Subversion is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and IBM Rational ClearCase. See our Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.