We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"We have approximately 300 to 400 users using this solution. Our whole organization uses it. I rate the scalability of Bitbucket an eight out of ten."
"This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."
"It seems to be quite scalable."
"Bitbucket lets me create new projects in a few clicks and check out files in a seamless and integrated manner."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its issue management."
"The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it is has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"The scalability could be improved."
"Even with the automation, we've had some situations where we've had mistakes. They've integrated things into the wrong place, so there's a fairly steep learning curve."
"I rate Bitbucket five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap."
"It goes well with other Atlassian solutions like Jira or Bamboo, but integration with other third-party solutions is more complex."
"The product could be less expensive for small companies."
"Bitbucket could improve search and indexing capabilities. There is only basic searching available. There is only the ability to index the main branch but not the subbranches. The search capabilities are dodgy."
"I think the configuration can be improved because it is getting more complicated and not very well organized."
"Sometimes we struggle with searching on repositories. It is a bit challenging sometimes to pinpoint the code or repositories when just filtering by repositories."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, GitHub, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, IBM Rational ClearCase and Liquibase. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.