We performed a comparison between Bitbucket and IBM Rational ClearCase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Bitbucket works fine for what I'm doing. It's slightly different from GitHub, but it's a good tool for storing code."
"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."
"The most valuable thing we have found is the workloads are good in Jira and we are able to control the access."
"Bitbucket's most valuable feature is the web interface, which is useful compared to other tools, has a lot of features, and is intuitive."
"Bitbucket is an integral part of our CI/CD project."
"Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its capabilities."
"BitBucket is a reliable and user-friendly product."
"The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, including some change management tools. The overall process was normal."
"ClearCase integrates well with other engineering tools and frameworks such as the Eclipse environment."
"IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability."
"The product could be less expensive for small companies."
"Technical support is not very fast."
"When users are given access for the first time, they should have some basic setups to help them specify their purposes."
"I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."
"The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved."
"The scalability could be improved."
"Bitbucket should come with code review pre-integrated, which would be better than integrating another tool into the solution."
"Currently, what's lacking in Bitbucket is the assignment feature."
"I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly."
"The protection needs to be improved."
"The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool."
Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews while IBM Rational ClearCase is ranked 8th in Version Control with 6 reviews. Bitbucket is rated 8.4, while IBM Rational ClearCase is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational ClearCase writes "Useful for version control but UI is slow ". Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and Liquibase, whereas IBM Rational ClearCase is most compared with Git, GitHub, IBM Rational ClearQuest, Helix Core and Apache Subversion. See our Bitbucket vs. IBM Rational ClearCase report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.