We performed a comparison between Ataccama ONE Platform and Informatica MDM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality."The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."
"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."
"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."
"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."
"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."
"It provides all the typical MDM capabilities like deduplication and machine survivorship."
"It is easy to create REST-based interfaces of the master data objects."
"The Provisioning tool is something that is really handy for everyone. It is my pick as the best feature."
"I think that it's a good solution...It is stable because we have the experience to deploy this solution."
"It has improved our organization because it has made our data more reliable. Data is the most important asset these days, and in order to trust your data, you need these tools to make sure that your data is clean and reliable."
"The ability to clean out data and improve the data quality is the best feature."
"The most valuable features of Informatica MDM are the IDQ and RDM data management."
"It comes with lot of features and is a one-stop-shop solution for integration, data modeling, and data governance. Everything can be built under one particular umbrella. If any issues come up, then there won't be any blame game saying that it could be an integration issue or an MDM hub issue because it's wholly owned by Informatica. That's the biggest advantage of Informatica MDM over that of any other tools that are available on the market."
"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."
"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."
"Data movement is a pain."
"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."
"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."
"Needs to implement the new workflow with simple steps and a quick visualization with a 360 view of the data."
"The cost of Informatica MDM is expensive and has room for improvement."
"The UI is terrible and not user-friendly."
"Inserting the GenAI into the master data management will reduce the overall effort of operational activities."
"Informatica MDM has a complex user interface, which could be improved."
"They have too many diversified products. If you don't know Informatica, it's very confusing and feels very idiotic."
"The configurations could be better. It is a bit confusing because we must develop two tools when building a data model in Informatica MDM. Even though Informatica MDM is a single tool, we have our hub console plus the provisioning tool within that. Whatever data model we are building in the hub console, we have to develop it in the provisioning tool again. It is double the work to create a data model. We are also using external calls or the Java custom plans functions. This can be both positive and negative. Since MDM as a client does not support any complex validation, we have to depend on the external call or a Java call. Every time we deployed, the entire solution was impacted if something went wrong."
"The tool should provide a unified user interface to manage the data objects."
Ataccama ONE Platform is ranked 8th in Data Quality with 5 reviews while Informatica MDM is ranked 1st in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions with 43 reviews. Ataccama ONE Platform is rated 7.8, while Informatica MDM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ataccama ONE Platform writes "Robust data management and governance praised for its user-friendly interface and scalability, but potential drawbacks include the need for improvements in search functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica MDM writes "Optimize business processes while ensuring that users see a return on their investment from the use of the product". Ataccama ONE Platform is most compared with Microsoft Purview, Collibra Governance, Profisee, Alation Data Catalog and Informatica Data Quality, whereas Informatica MDM is most compared with Reltio Cloud, SAP Master Data Governance, Profisee, IBM InfoSphere MDM and SAS MDM.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.