We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Drupal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Liferay and others in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals)."Atlassian Confluence is flexible and allows adding different types of context on the page and connecting a hypertext, like a web page, without a source."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution is very intuitive and provides excellent content management."
"It seems highly scalable. There are 500 end users using this solution."
"Collaboration is most valuable. You can upload or create your documents on Confluence and share them with your team members. Your team members also can share documents."
"The most valuable feature of Atlassian Confluence is the ability to access your files from anywhere."
"The customization that Confluence offers is one of its most useful features. You can customise it based on the specific project you are working on. It also supports multiple languages."
"The solution is stable."
"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."
"You can build websites on it very quickly."
"It is good for big projects."
"The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."
"The UI is good but bland. It could be updated a bit to make it more modern and interesting to look at."
"The product is considered expensive."
"When we have a project that we don't want to share with everybody but want people to know that it exists, there is no way to do this in Confluence. When a project is not shared, people cannot see that it exits."
"I would like to see integration with Slack."
"There are some issues with performance when creating tables."
"It lacks ease of integration."
"We would like there to be more advanced data manipulation features available in this solution, such as creating more complex charts, and a column freezing option."
"There is room for improvement in maybe the tree structure for articles. If you have a lot of articles, it becomes difficult to navigate."
"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."
"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."
"It is a little bit simplified."
"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."
Earn 20 points
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while Drupal is ranked 4th in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals). Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Drupal is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Adobe Experience Manager, whereas Drupal is most compared with SharePoint, WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, Magnolia CMS and Liferay Digital Experience Platform.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.