We performed a comparison between Drupal and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."
"You can build websites on it very quickly."
"It is good for big projects."
"The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news."
"It allows for simultaneous users to be on it."
"The product provides flexibility in collaboration."
"It offers ease of use, which is crucial."
"It has an easy to distribute administration capability, and can also scale to meet a large number of future needs."
"The ability to quickly and easily create team sites has been great."
"It is well supported by Microsoft."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."
"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."
"It is a little bit simplified."
"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."
"Integration needs to be more straightforward, particularly with Azure. SharePoint also needs a more comprehensive introductory course for users."
"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."
"The product could be improved in a lot of way. It is so frustrating to get things to work as advertised."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
"We do sell Hyland OnBase, which is probably a competitor to SharePoint and does a lot more. In our own organization, we haven't had a need for it, but certainly, for our customers, we are finding that to be a better fit. In terms of the technical reasons for that, I'm not involved much on that side, so I can't give specifics, but there is certainly room for them to improve or add on certain features that clearly are not available in SharePoint, but they are available in Hyland OnBase."
"Needs improvement on the user interface."
"The integration with Outlook could be improved."
"It should have a Google-caliber search ability and a model-based GUI."
Earn 20 points
Drupal is ranked 5th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 146 reviews. Drupal is rated 8.6, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Drupal is most compared with WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, Magnolia CMS, Atlassian Confluence and Liferay Digital Experience Platform, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors and best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
