We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Workplace by Facebook based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is just the fact that it is a one-stop shop for all project documentation. It is compared to storing things in files and directories and stuff like that. It provides the overall usability and accessibility of many projects and documents in one area."
"It is a very popular tool."
"Pricing is not a problem."
"The interface is good....I didn't face any issues with the scalability. It was very good."
"It is stable and reliable."
"It seems highly scalable. There are 500 end users using this solution."
"It's easy to search for information."
"The product has a valuable feature for quick verification of documents."
"A full-featured collaboration tool that is as easy to use as Facebook."
"The product was easy to use."
"Storage is the best thing about the solution."
"The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access."
"Confluence cannot replace Microsoft Word at the moment, so even though it can be used as a document management system, it is not meant for document creation, which adds a lot of limitations to it."
"We have to use other applications that make Atlassian Confluence more customized for what you want. They should improve by adding the ability to make more customizations."
"They can improve the table feature of Confluence. It is currently not adequate."
"There could be an option to collaborate with other users while editing the documents."
"Some elements of the user interface could be more user-friendly, including embedding diagrams."
"There is room for improvement in maybe the tree structure for articles. If you have a lot of articles, it becomes difficult to navigate."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The product is considered expensive."
"The product should allow users to assign tasks and automate processes."
"The implementation could be made easier."
"There needs to be a restriction on who can download content."
"The conferencing feature does not work well with multiple parties or locations."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Social Software with 99 reviews while Workplace by Facebook is ranked 9th in Enterprise Social Software with 4 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Workplace by Facebook is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Workplace by Facebook writes "A scalable and easy-to-use solution that can be used for internal communication and storage". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas Workplace by Facebook is most compared with Yammer and SharePoint. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Workplace by Facebook report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
