We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the provided SDKs."
"Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements"
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"The solution's best feature is its exceptional speed, delivering efficient utilization of resources."
"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."
"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."
"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"
"Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."
"The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers."
"VMware RabbitMQ needs to create a new queue system."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"The product needs to focus on offering more use case documentation because browsing the internet to find it can be a process filled with struggles."
"The availability could be better."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 10th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 41 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, Apache Kafka and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ, ActiveMQ and Red Hat AMQ. See our Aurea CX Messenger vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
