We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I find that it provides better agility in regards to job execution features."
"We get better reports than we use to have."
"The aggregator reporting utility which tells us our throughput in lag and latency."
"Running anything in crontab, you need to put a lot of logic into it to make it work. With this product, you don't have to worry about it. You have the schedule object where you put all the dates or holidays in it, and it does it for you."
"This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"It works constantly and is pretty seamless. You do not have to open up many support tickets."
"It allows you to automate tasks, and reduce headcount, prevent errors, self-heal."
"We use CA Workload Automation AE r11.3.6 to automate enterprise-wide scheduling and file transfers using an FTP plugin."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types."
"Ease of implementation for upgrades."
"The reporting system, currently, could be better."
"The cross-platform arena, where you can run work on multiple platforms, needs improvement."
"Performance improvements in the UI would be appreciated."
"Quick search feature and job analysis could be improved."
"Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier."
"In terms of what should be in the next release, I want integration and AI and so on. I'd like easy reporting where you can compare information, for example, "that job normally takes three minutes and last time it took six minutes or 10 minutes." Then you can get the information to the engineer of which job is taking more time than normal - understanding strange behavior compared to the baseline."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 8th in Workload Automation with 40 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.