We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."
"The solution provides good integrations."
"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."
"The integration is a good feature."
"The integration is a good feature."
"One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies."
"TeamCity is very useful due to the fact that it has a strong plug-in system."
"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."
"It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack."
"Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end."
"VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."
"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."
"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."
"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."
"The deployment fails sometimes."
"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."
"Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted."
"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."
"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."
"Integrating with certain technologies posed challenges related to time and required support from the respective technology teams to ensure smooth integration with TeamCity."
"I need some more graphical design."
"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."
AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Harness and Tekton.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.