We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The tool makes pushing codes and setting up CI/CD pipelines easy."
"It is an amazingly stable solution."
"Our code is secure."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes half an hour to deploy."
"It is an easily scalable solution."
"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."
"The product is easy to maintain."
"Bitbucket Server supports code collaboration by providing commands developers can use to check in code. Through comments, developers can specify the purpose of the code check-in. Additionally, Bitbucket allows tagging of code for releases."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."
"The product's initial setup phase is complex."
"The product interface consists of multiple features that are complicated to navigate for new users."
"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."
"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."
"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."
"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."
"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Bitbucket Server is ranked 2nd in Version Control with 20 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket Server writes "An easy to use solution that works as a code repository for developers and helps them merge changes ". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, Bitbucket, GitHub and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Bitbucket Server is most compared with Bitbucket, AWS CodeCommit and GitHub. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket Server report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.