We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."
"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"Code deployment is the best feature."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."
"The setup time is a bit long."
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 13 reviews while Harness is ranked 8th in Build Automation with 1 review. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while Harness is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and TeamCity, whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and Cloudability.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
