We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."
"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"The integration with other applications is fabulous."
"The integrations are good."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."
"TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool."
"It's easy to move to a new release because of templates and meta-runners, and agent pooling."
"VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."
"The integration is a valuable feature."
"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."
"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."
"I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC."
"The setup time is a bit long."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."
"The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain."
"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."
"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."
"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."
"Integrating with certain technologies posed challenges related to time and required support from the respective technology teams to ensure smooth integration with TeamCity."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 13 reviews while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Harness, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Harness and Incredibuild. See our AWS CodePipeline vs. TeamCity report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
