We compared Cloudflare DNS and Azure DNS based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Cloudflare DNS is praised for its fast performance, privacy features, global network coverage, and reliable uptime, with positive comments on customer service and return on investment. Azure DNS is highly regarded for its reliability, scalability, ease of use, and seamless integration with other Azure services, alongside positive feedback on customer service and pricing structure. Areas for improvement in Cloudflare DNS include reducing deployment times, while Azure DNS users seek increased reliability, a more user-friendly interface, and clearer pricing structures.
Features: While Cloudflare DNS offers fast performance, enhanced privacy and security, and an extensive global network, Azure DNS is valued for its reliability, scalability, ease of use, seamless integration with Azure services, and competitive pricing.
Pricing and ROI: Cloudflare DNS has no significant setup costs, while Azure DNS is highly regarded for its cost-effectiveness and flexibility. The setup process for Azure DNS is hassle-free and straightforward, making it easy to get started. Azure DNS also offers versatile licensing choices suitable for different user requirements., Cloudflare DNS offers improved website performance, increased security, and reliable DNS resolution. Azure DNS provides cost-effectiveness, efficiency, increased productivity, easy setup, and management options.
Room for Improvement: Cloudflare DNS users have pointed out areas for improvement, while users of Azure DNS have highlighted the need for increased reliability and uptime, better management interface, more comprehensive documentation and support resources, and a simpler pricing structure.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user feedback, the duration to establish a new tech solution varies for both Cloudflare DNS and Azure DNS. Some users of Cloudflare DNS reported spending up to three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others mentioned needing a week for both. The timeframes mentioned by users of Azure DNS also varied, with some spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup. However, it is important to consider the context in which these terms are used, as they may refer to the same period of time., In terms of customer service, Cloudflare DNS has received positive feedback for its prompt and helpful assistance, while Azure DNS is praised for its responsiveness and efficient support.
The summary above is based on 36 interviews we conducted recently with Cloudflare DNS and Azure DNS users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution allows you to host DNS service without using Azure's servers."
"The speed of the queries is valuable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a stable product."
"Can be configured to achieve a hundred percent reliability"
"I like the feature where I can add multiple DNS records for the same subdomain."
"Azure DNS is a user-friendly and very easy-to-manage solution."
"One of the key benefits of Azure DNS is its integration with other Azure services. As it is a solution developed by Microsoft, it is easy to integrate with other Azure offerings. Azure DNS also includes Defender for DNS, a feature that protects against anomalies and threats on the DNS. This added security is provided directly by Microsoft. The integration and security features of Azure DNS make it a valuable option for users of the Azure cloud platform."
"Integration with other Azure services is good."
"The most valuable features of the solution are performance and security."
"Its ease of integration with Office 365 and the fact that it's a good product compared to what I had before"
"Cloudflare DNS is widely used, and it's good for websites. If we use Cloudflare DNS and update one record, it updates in their office instantly."
"Even when there is a high load on our servers, Cloudflare is able to cache the data and serve it to users, ensuring they can still access the website."
"The solution automatically detects and responds to certain types of traffic based on geolocation."
"The attacker won't have details since my public IP is anonymous. It offers us good privacy."
"The most valuable feature of Cloudflare DNS is security."
"I get a lot of value from Cloudflare's API because it enables you to build a separate environment inside the solution. You can create a domain for performing test requests before you move to the production environment and connect various domains."
"The licensing cost should be improved."
"Domain registration is one of the problems. We need to go to application services or web apps to purchase the domain instead. If that were to be equivalent to AWS's Route 53 that would be good. But, it is not as flexible as that."
"Azure DNS sticks mostly with the Azure native solution and doesn't scale well in a multi-cloud or hybrid environment."
"I would like to see more security features and protection."
"There are issues with the cloud systems."
"Azure DNS does provide enhanced support for applications and includes several security features to protect against threats. One of the security features it offers is the ability to detect and prevent dangling DNS records, which can be used in cyber attacks. Dangling DNS records occur when a website owner creates a domain name but forgets to remove the CNAME record, leaving the domain vulnerable to takeover by malicious actors. Azure DNS includes security measures to identify and prevent such threats, helping to keep your DNS infrastructure secure. However, if Microsoft could add more security capabilities to the DNS, that would be great to detect and identify anomalies that are happening to prevent cyber threats."
"I would like to see more integration with other platforms, improved stability, enhanced security, and better pricing because there is always room for improvement."
"Azure needs to add domain registration to the DNS service."
"The tool needs to improve caching of servers. The product needs to include PFX certificate as well."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"The analytics, basically the dashboard, doesn't have much to it."
"We have noticed multiple instances where Cloudflare falsely indicates that our servers are down, even when there is no actual load on them. This makes it challenging for us to identify the exact issue."
"It would be helpful if the solution could continue evolving to compete with the other solutions on the market."
"Cloudflare should add more documentation and pricing to the cloud version."
"I believe they currently have this feature, but there will most likely be integration with APIs so we can control some features through API."
"Cloudflare's free plan is limited to 5,000 records for their free plan. They should increase that. For example, if I create a domain called abc.com and a subdomain called a.abc.com, my record count will be two. I can make a maximum of 5,000 subdomains. However, if we use our own DNS hosted on another provider, there is no limit. Their free plan also lacks name server customization."
Azure DNS is ranked 2nd in Managed DNS with 31 reviews while Cloudflare DNS is ranked 1st in Managed DNS with 13 reviews. Azure DNS is rated 8.4, while Cloudflare DNS is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure DNS writes "Offers good performance and helps its users with disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudflare DNS writes "A tool that offers good performance that needs to improve in areas like assessment and payload". Azure DNS is most compared with Amazon Route 53, Cisco Umbrella, Infoblox DDI, Google Cloud DNS and Quad9, whereas Cloudflare DNS is most compared with Quad9, Google Cloud DNS, Cisco Umbrella, Amazon Route 53 and Hurricane Electric Free DNS. See our Azure DNS vs. Cloudflare DNS report.
See our list of best Managed DNS vendors.
We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.