We performed a comparison between Azure DNS and Google Cloud DNS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Managed DNS solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The speed of the queries is valuable."
"Azure DNS is a user-friendly and very easy-to-manage solution."
"If you're running your enterprise application on Azure, it's convenient to use Azure DNS. It has native integration with other Azure solutions, and Microsoft is a globally recognized DNS provider. You also get CDN services. If you're a media company that requires on-demand data streaming, your DNS plays a vital role by working with CDN services to publish your application. It's cheaper and easier to expand your solution."
"The initial setup is easy and the solution is user-friendly"
"We use the solution to host IP addresses, sites like microsites."
"Data protection is paramount across cloud platforms"
"The most valuable features of Azure DNS are the DNS forwarder and the DNS additional record editions."
"The solution allows you to host DNS service without using Azure's servers."
"The scalability is good."
"Google Cloud DNS continues to evolve based on customer feedback and technological advancements."
"The tool is well integrated. We don’t need the interface of another provider. The product helps me manage my domain and write in Google Cloud."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"It is a scalable solution."
"They should include more integration with other platforms."
"There are some issues with the solution's performance where improvements are needed."
"Azure DNS sticks mostly with the Azure native solution and doesn't scale well in a multi-cloud or hybrid environment."
"There are some latency issues that could be improved."
"I would like to see more security features and protection."
"The CDN integration could be improved."
"The initial setup of this solution could be less complex and require less manual configurations."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Migrating away from Google Cloud DNS can be difficult."
"The UI is tricky to understand for people who have not worked with DNS records. People with little to no experience with DNS records can find it hard to understand. For example, you need to know the hallmarks to input records since they need to be matched in a specific format."
"It needs to provide better integration."
"The cost of using Google Cloud DNS can be relatively high compared to other options, especially considering the cloud environment."
"The UX of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The solution's price could be better."
Azure DNS is ranked 2nd in Managed DNS with 31 reviews while Google Cloud DNS is ranked 6th in Managed DNS with 6 reviews. Azure DNS is rated 8.4, while Google Cloud DNS is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure DNS writes "Offers good performance and helps its users with disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud DNS writes "Constantly improving and adapting to customer needs". Azure DNS is most compared with Amazon Route 53, Cloudflare DNS, Cisco Umbrella, Infoblox DDI and Quad9, whereas Google Cloud DNS is most compared with Quad9, Cloudflare DNS, Amazon Route 53, Cisco Umbrella and Verisign Public DNS. See our Azure DNS vs. Google Cloud DNS report.
See our list of best Managed DNS vendors.
We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
