We performed a comparison between Bitbucket and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control."The planning model is good, and so is the suite of applications around it."
"Bitbucket has a pull request-based method, similar to Git's merge request feature."
"Bitbucket is feasible and friendly compared to Visual Studio DevOps on the Microsoft platform."
"This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."
"We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its capabilities."
"The tool's automation helped because we onboarded a lot of projects and teams into Bitbucket. The product's automation helped us complete activities in two days which previously used to take around two weeks to complete. We have completely automated processes that were earlier manual. It has good integration with Jira and Jenkins."
"Its key strength lies in securing and centralizing code repositories."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"Bitbucket's usability and integration with other tools could be improved somewhat. My other issue is that Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, and all the other ones use slightly different jargon for the same things. They should come up with a standard language for all these tools."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"Bitbucket could improve its security. For example, the user access security could improve."
"Bitbucket's Initial setup is a little complicated because you need to install and configure the solution. It can take one or two days to deploy Bitbucket. If you have a high workload, you can deploy it on multiple server farms as needed"
"Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash."
"The solution is not user-friendly. Right now, the solution is not so easy to understand. It needs to update its design and overall user experience."
"There are many places where the product could be expanded to make it a more complete solution."
"Technical support is not very fast."
"The pricing is quite high."
Earn 20 points
Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control. Bitbucket is rated 8.4, while Liquibase is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "A unique product that is easy to implement, with great automation capabilities ". Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and Git, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Git and DBmaestro Database Source Control.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.